Version: ____ Date: ____ Site/scope: ____ Decision owner: ____ This worksheet records a local qualification exercise. Results apply to the documented conditions; they are not a general technology accuracy claim.
1. Required observation#
Operational question to answer: ____ Object being identified: ____ Asset/location/connection distinction: ____ Required timing and scope: ____ Current workflow and independently checked baseline: ____ Proposed barcode/RFID/AIM/combined workflow: ____ Evidence the method can establish: ____ Conclusions it must not infer without other evidence: ____ Named asset owner: ____ Connection owner: ____ Field reviewer: ____ System administrator: ____ Integration owner: ____
2. Identity and coverage#
Asset or connection identifier convention: ____ Encoded payload/tag-to-record mapping and owner: ____ Tag assignment and independent physical association check: ____ Replacement/duplicate/unknown identifier handling: ____ Intended inventory area or monitored connection points: ____ Outside-control area/IDs: ____ AIM supported components and unmonitored segments, when applicable: ____ Manual fallback and current confirmed record retained during uncertainty: ____
3. Exact trial configuration#
Tag or printed-label part: ____ Attachment method and location: ____ Reader/scanner/controller and antenna references: ____ Software, firmware and configuration revision: ____ Equipment/surface/orientation/door/neighbor conditions: ____ Connection mode, accounts, external services and permissions: ____ Supplier documentation and unresolved application limits: ____ Tag battery requirements and maintenance, if applicable: ____ Approved change or isolated test arrangement: ____ Observation window and operator: ____
4. Predefined acceptance gates#
| Requirement | Project-specific criterion | How checked | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected-object coverage | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| Boundary exclusion | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| Correct identity lookup | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| Connection-event mapping if in scope | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| Interrupted integration/recovery | ____ | ____ | ____ |
| Exception closeout and fallback | ____ | ____ | ____ |
Independently verified inside population and evidence: ____ Independently verified outside controls and evidence: ____
5. Observation register#
| Session/time | Object key | Expected inside/outside/event | Observed result | Duplicate/unknown/missed | Record decision | Evidence/reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ |
Inside distinct IDs observed: ____ / expected inside IDs: ____ = ____% Outside controls observed: ____ / defined outside controls: ____ = ____% State this as a rate for the chosen control set, not a general technology false-positive rate. Repeated observations excluded from distinct-object counts: ____ Unknown identifiers: ____ Unresolved mapping conflicts: ____ AIM expected endpoint event versus observed endpoint event: ____ Stale/delayed events and integration interruption outcome: ____ Physical observations requiring separate confirmation: ____ Corrective action, configuration revision and affected retests: ____
6. Operating effort and decision#
Measured preparation/observation/exception/reconciliation time: ____ Hardware and tagging cost from dated quotes: ____ Software, support, integration and maintenance cost scope: ____ Excluded/unknown costs and assumptions: ____ Retirement process for object, physical tag and mapping: ____ Record of failed as well as accepted sessions: ____ Pass/conditional pass/unresolved: ____ Authorized scope: ____ Remaining conditions and owners: ____ Fallback until closure: ____ Next decision date or trigger: ____